girls' name 2013–2017

Indigo

Indigo is losing ground — from #98 in 2013 to #294 in 2017.

+ sibling names →
#294 last ranked in 2017
5 registrations that year
147 total 2013–2017

Note: Indigo hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

Registrations dropped from 114 to 5 (-96%).

0408012016020020132014201520162017peak
Peak 2013 · 114
Low 2014 · 5
Years tracked 5

Neighbours in the 2017 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Indigo, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2017

How often Indigo was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Indigo popularity by state — 2017Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 5 (rank #272)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Indigo — popularity by state & territory in 2017. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (5 babies)

South Australia
5 #272
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2017: 5 babies named Indigo across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Indigo?
Between 2013 and 2017, Indigo was registered for 147 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Indigo a popular name in Australia?
Indigo has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017, when it last ranked #294 with 5 registrations. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.