girls' name 2011–2017

Isobel

Isobel is gaining traction — chosen by more Aussie parents than a few years back.

+ sibling names →
#129 last ranked in 2017
15 registrations that year
76 total 2011–2017

Note: Isobel hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

Registrations: 6 in 2011 → 15 in 2017 (+150%).

Highest rank: #129 in 2016.

02040608010020112012201520162017peak
Peak 2016 · 18
Low 2011 · 6
Years tracked 6

Neighbours in the 2017 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Isobel, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2017

How often Isobel was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Isobel popularity by state — 2017Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 15 (rank #98)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Isobel — popularity by state & territory in 2017. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (15 babies)

South Australia
15 #98
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2017: 15 babies named Isobel across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Isobel?
Between 2011 and 2017, Isobel was registered for 76 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Isobel a popular name in Australia?
Isobel has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017, when it last ranked #129 with 15 registrations. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.