girls' name 2015–2017

Jaida

Jaida is a relatively new entry in the Australian data — first registrations in 2015.

+ sibling names →
#1685 last ranked in 2017
1 registration that year
3 total 2015–2017

Note: Jaida hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

In 2017 it ranked #1685 with 1 registrations.

020406080100201520162017peak
Peak 2015 · 1
Low 2015 · 1
Years tracked 3

Neighbours in the 2017 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Jaida, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2017

How often Jaida was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Jaida popularity by state — 2017Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 1 (rank #868)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Jaida — popularity by state & territory in 2017. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (1 baby)

South Australia
1 #868
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2017: 1 baby named Jaida across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Jaida?
Between 2015 and 2017, Jaida was registered for 3 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Jaida a popular name in Australia?
Jaida has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017, when it last ranked #1685 with 1 registration. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.