girls' name 2015–2017

Jayla

Jayla is a relatively new entry in the Australian data — first registrations in 2015.

+ sibling names →
#1716 last ranked in 2017
1 registration that year
3 total 2015–2017

Note: Jayla hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

In 2017 it ranked #1716 with 1 registrations.

020406080100201520162017peak
Peak 2015 · 1
Low 2015 · 1
Years tracked 3

Neighbours in the 2017 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Jayla, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2017

How often Jayla was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Jayla popularity by state — 2017Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 1 (rank #868)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Jayla — popularity by state & territory in 2017. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (1 baby)

South Australia
1 #868
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2017: 1 baby named Jayla across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Jayla?
Between 2015 and 2017, Jayla was registered for 3 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Jayla a popular name in Australia?
Jayla has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017, when it last ranked #1716 with 1 registration. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.