boys' name 2010–2017

Jed

Jed is losing ground — from #125 in 2010 to #261 in 2017.

+ sibling names →
#261 last ranked in 2017
6 registrations that year
31 total 2010–2017

Note: Jed hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

Registrations dropped from 7 to 6 (-14%).

Peak popularity was in 2014 (9 registrations).

0204060801002010201420162017peak
Peak 2014 · 9
Low 2017 · 6
Years tracked 4

Neighbours in the 2017 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Jed, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2017

How often Jed was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Jed popularity by state — 2017Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 6 (rank #251)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Jed — popularity by state & territory in 2017. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (6 babies)

South Australia
6 #251
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2017: 6 babies named Jed across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Jed?
Between 2010 and 2017, Jed was registered for 31 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Jed a popular name in Australia?
Jed has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017, when it last ranked #261 with 6 registrations. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.