girls' name 1952–1959

Jill

Jill is losing ground — from #62 in 1952 to #100 in 1959.

+ sibling names →
#100 last ranked in 1959
77 registrations that year
787 total 1952–1959

Note: Jill hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 1959. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

Registrations dropped from 138 to 77 (-44%).

0408012016020019521954195519571959peak
Peak 1952 · 138
Low 1959 · 77
Years tracked 7

Neighbours in the 1959 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Jill, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 1959

How often Jill was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Jill popularity by state — 1959Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: 77 (rank #100)Northern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: no data for this yearTasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Jill — popularity by state & territory in 1959. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in New South Wales (77 babies)

New South Wales
77 #100
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory
Queensland
South Australia
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 1959: 77 babies named Jill across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Jill?
Between 1952 and 1959, Jill was registered for 787 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Jill a popular name in Australia?
Jill has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 1959, when it last ranked #100 with 77 registrations. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.