girls' name 2014–2016

Kitana

Kitana is a relatively new entry in the Australian data — first registrations in 2014.

+ sibling names →
#1850 last ranked in 2016
1 registration that year
3 total 2014–2016

Note: Kitana hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2016. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

In 2016 it ranked #1850 with 1 registrations.

020406080100201420152016peak
Peak 2014 · 1
Low 2014 · 1
Years tracked 3

Neighbours in the 2016 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Kitana, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2016

How often Kitana was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Kitana popularity by state — 2016Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 1 (rank #839)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Kitana — popularity by state & territory in 2016. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (1 baby)

South Australia
1 #839
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2016: 1 baby named Kitana across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Kitana?
Between 2014 and 2016, Kitana was registered for 3 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Kitana a popular name in Australia?
Kitana has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2016, when it last ranked #1850 with 1 registration. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.