boys' name 2011–2017

Ned

Ned is losing ground — from #157 in 2011 to #1830 in 2017.

+ sibling names →
#1830 last ranked in 2017
1 registration that year
25 total 2011–2017

Note: Ned hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

Registrations dropped from 5 to 1 (-80%).

Peak popularity was in 2016 (7 registrations).

02040608010020112014201520162017peak
Peak 2016 · 7
Low 2017 · 1
Years tracked 5

Neighbours in the 2017 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Ned, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2017

How often Ned was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Ned popularity by state — 2017Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 1 (rank #803)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Ned — popularity by state & territory in 2017. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (1 baby)

South Australia
1 #803
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2017: 1 baby named Ned across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Ned?
Between 2011 and 2017, Ned was registered for 25 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Ned a popular name in Australia?
Ned has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2017, when it last ranked #1830 with 1 registration. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.