girls' name 2002–2016

Shakira

Shakira is losing ground — from #72 in 2002 to #793 in 2016.

+ sibling names →
#793 last ranked in 2016
2 registrations that year
176 total 2002–2016

Note: Shakira hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 2016. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

Registrations dropped from 172 to 2 (-99%).

040801201602002002201420152016peak
Peak 2002 · 172
Low 2014 · 1
Years tracked 4

Neighbours in the 2016 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Shakira, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 2016

How often Shakira was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Shakira popularity by state — 2016Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: no data for this yearSouth Australia: 2 (rank #518)Tasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Shakira — popularity by state & territory in 2016. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in South Australia (2 babies)

South Australia
2 #518
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
Queensland
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 2016: 2 babies named Shakira across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Shakira?
Between 2002 and 2016, Shakira was registered for 176 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Shakira a popular name in Australia?
Shakira has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 2016, when it last ranked #793 with 2 registrations. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.