girls' name 1952–1964

Glenda

Glenda is losing ground — from #50 in 1952 to #116 in 1964.

+ sibling names →
#116 last ranked in 1964
40 registrations that year
1,627 total 1952–1964

Note: Glenda hasn't appeared in any Australian state's published top-100 list since 1964. State BDM registries publish only the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold no longer show in the data even if babies are still being given them. Read more about coverage limits.

Popularity over the years

Registrations dropped from 176 to 40 (-77%).

0408012016020019521955195819611964peak
Peak 1952 · 176
Low 1963 · 40
Years tracked 13

Neighbours in the 1964 ranking

Names with similar popularity. If you're considering Glenda, you might also like these:

By state & territory — 1964

How often Glenda was registered in each of the 8 Australian states and territories.

Glenda popularity by state — 1964Australian Capital Territory: no data for this yearNew South Wales: no data for this yearNorthern Territory: no data for this yearQueensland: 40 (rank #95)South Australia: no data for this yearTasmania: no data for this yearVictoria: no data for this yearWestern Australia: no data for this yearACTNSWNTQLDSATASVICWA
Glenda — popularity by state & territory in 1964. Hover a state for details, click to view the full Top 50 for that state.
Show full data table

Most popular in Queensland (40 babies)

Queensland
40 #95
Australian Capital Territory
New South Wales
Northern Territory
South Australia
Tasmania
Victoria
Western Australia

In 1964: 40 babies named Glenda across 1 of 8 states and territories.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies in Australia have been named Glenda?
Between 1952 and 1964, Glenda was registered for 1,627 babies in the available state datasets.
Is Glenda a popular name in Australia?
Glenda has fallen out of every Australian state's published top-100 list since 1964, when it last ranked #116 with 40 registrations. Each state's Births, Deaths & Marriages registry only publishes the top 100 names per year — names below that threshold disappear from the data even if babies are still being given them.